Ring Conformation

Cyclohexane ring conformation

Core Concepts

This article revolves around understanding the dynamic spatial arrangements of cyclic structures. Explaining the fundamentals of a ring conformation. Specifically, the characteristics of ring conformations in cyclopropane, cyclobutane, cyclopentane, and cyclohexane, showing the deviations from idealized geometries and the impact of these conformations on stability and reactivity.

Topics Covered in Other Articles

What is a Ring Conformation?

A ring conformation refers to the specific spatial arrangements assumed by nonplanar cyclic structures, and these arrangements can transition through formal rotations about single bonds. These conformations are influenced primarily by optimal bond angles and the effects of steric hindrance, representing the dynamic 3D variations of a molecule within a closed ring. Conformation favorability is generally determined by two types of strain: angle strain, due to sp3 bond angles departing from the ideal 109.5 degrees, and torsional strain, due to the sterics of eclipsing hydrogens.

Cyclopropane Conformations

Cyclopropane consists of three carbon atoms and six hydrogen atoms arranged in a ring, making it a highly reactive organic compound. Many industrial chemicals incorporate it, and it also finds application as a fuel.

One fundamental aspect of cyclopropane is its planar configuration, resulting from the necessity to establish a flat plane with three carbon atoms. This unique inflexibility, driven by its compact ring size and the substantial angle strain induced by its planar arrangement of three carbon atoms, inhibits cyclopropane from adopting more stable non-planar structures.

Planar Ring Conformation

In cyclopropane, the normal tetrahedral bond angle of a sp3-hybridized atom, typically 109.5°, departs significantly, with internal angles at 60°. This departure by 49.5° leads to the formation of weaker “bent” bonds and angle strain, while also causing the C—H bonds of the ring to be eclipsed, introducing torsional strain. Consequently, the orbitals used for cyclopropane’s bonds exhibit a change from pure sp3, containing a greater p character.

Despite the ideal bonding scenario where overlapping orbitals between carbon atoms align directly, cyclopropane faces a substantial hurdle—the severe bond angle strain that prevents such alignment. To address this, cyclopropane employs “banana bonds,” a unique bonding approach where orbital overlap no longer occurs directly in line between the two nuclei, helping to mitigate some of the strain within the molecule.

Side View

The effects of angle and torsional strain combine to significantly weaken the C-C ring bonds in cyclopropane compared to open-chain propane. Specifically, cyclopropane’s C-C ring bonds possess an energy of 255 kJ/mol, contrasting starkly with the 370 kJ/mol for C-C bonds in open-chain propane. This diminished bond strength renders cyclopropane more reactive when compared to its linear counterparts.

Cyclobutane Conformations

In cyclobutane, bond angles deviate from the ideal tetrahedral angle of 109.5 degrees, being approximately 90 degrees, a significant difference. This discrepancy in bond angles leads to angle strain, contributing to the molecule’s reduced stability. Angle strain isn’t the sole challenge faced by cyclobutane. It also contends with a torsional strain that occurs between the eclipsing hydrogen atoms attached to neighboring carbon atoms, further amplifying the overall strain experienced by the molecule.

Planar Ring Conformation

To mitigate some of this strain, cyclobutane adopts a “puckered” conformation. The carbon atoms in the cyclobutane ring no longer lie in a single plane; they assume a bent, puckered structure.. This deviation allows the hydrogen atoms to shift away from the eclipsed position.

To get the puckered form two carbon atoms reside within one plane, while the other two occupy a perpendicular plane, resembling the shape of a butterfly. The created deviation allows the hydrogen atoms to shift away from the eclipsed position, this dynamic shifting of carbon atom positions permits temporary relief from torsional strain anyhow this relief comes at the expense of increased angle strain, resulting in a unique structural configuration.

Butterfly Ring Conformation

In this conformation, the angle of puckering is approximately 35 degrees, lending the molecule its distinctive shape. Additionally, the torsion angle alternates between +25 degrees and -25 degrees, creating a dynamic arrangement within the ring. The bond angle between the carbon atoms in this conformation, denoted as C-C-C, measures 86 degrees, showcasing the flexibility and adaptability of cyclobutane giving a smaller ring strain (110 kJ/mol) than in the case of cyclopropane (115 kJ/mol).

Cyclopentane Conformations

Unlike smaller cycloalkanes like cyclopropane and cyclobutane, cyclopentane manages to stay stable even though it’s a small ring, it is also known for its stability surpassed just by the cyclohexane. In the planar conformation, cyclopentane can arrange its carbon atoms in a flat way, almost like a pentagon. This arrangement has no angle strain, which is good, but it has a lot of torsional strain.

Planar Ring Conformation

Cyclopentane can ease torsional strain by adopting an envelope-like shape with one corner lifted, addressing the issue effectively. In this “envelope” conformation, four carbon atoms are in the same flat plane, and one sticks out. This conformation deviates from the ideal 109.5 degrees, measuring between 102 and 106 degrees.

While The envelope shape reduces torsional strain but introduces slight angle strain, which is worthwhile for its significant stability advantage. It’s the most stable conformation, surpassing both the flat form and the half-chair by 5.0 and 0.5 kcal/mol, respectively.

Cyclopentane Conformations

Since cyclopentane is not static it can change at room temperature, doing something called “ring inversion.” This means each of the five carbon atoms takes turns protruding, resembling a butterfly fluttering its wings.. It allows cyclopentane to explore different shapes depending on what it needs.

Cyclohexane Conformations

The primary conformations include the chair, boat, and twist forms, each with its own specific geometry and energy characteristics. These conformations play a crucial role in analyzing the stability and reactivity of cyclohexane in organic chemistry.

Chair Ring Conformation

The most stable conformation of cyclohexane is the chair conformation. In this arrangement, all carbon-carbon bond angles are set at 109.5°, eliminating any angle strain. Furthermore, there is no torsional strain, as the molecule’s bonds are staggered perfectly. This conformation is also advantageous because it maximally separates the hydrogen atoms at opposite corners of the cyclohexane ring.

chair conformational isomer ring conformation

This conformation is characterized by a unique arrangement of carbon-hydrogen (C-H) bonds, which can be categorized into two distinct types:

  1. Axial C-H Bonds: This oriented vertically in relation to the plane of the cyclohexane ring and are responsible for creating a three-dimensional “up-and-down” orientation within the chair conformation. Steric interactions between axial hydrogens or substituents are called “1,3-diaxial interactions”.
  2. Equatorial C-H Bonds: In contrast to axial C-H bonds, equatorial C-H bonds position themselves parallel to the plane of the cyclohexane ring within the chair conformation, thereby creating a more stable and energetically favorable configuration compared to axial bonds.
axial and equatorial bonds ring conformation
Axial C-H bonds in red and Equatorial C-H bonds in blue

At room temperature, cyclohexane molecules are in constant motion, with energy levels that permit rapid conformational changes. The energy barriers between the chair, boat, and twist conformations are low, making it impossible to isolate a single conformation.

ring conformation energy chart cyclohexane
Cyclohexane Conformational Isomers Energy Diagram

In fact, at room temperature, these conformations undergo about 1 million interconversions every second, a phenomenon known as ring-flipping.

ring flipping ring conformation
Ring-flipping interconversion between chair conformations

Despite the presence of multiple conformations, the chair conformation’s superior stability reigns supreme. At any given moment, over 99% of cyclohexane molecules are estimated to be in the chair conformation. The chair conformation’s dominance reflects its unique ability to maintain ideal angles, minimize strain, and offer stability.

Half-Chair Ring Conformation

An unstable and strained geometry characterizes the half chair conformation, unlike the more stable chair conformation; in the half chair conformation, only part of the cyclohexane ring adopts a chair-like shape, while the rest remains in a planar or twisted state. This conformation posses high energy (43kjmol-1) levels and is considered a transition state between the chair and boat conformations.

half chair conformational isomer

Boat Ring Conformation

While the chair conformation reigns supreme in stability, cyclohexane can adopt the boat conformation by a simple flip. However, the boat conformation is not without its drawbacks. Although it lacks angle strain, it does possess strain due to eclipsed C-H bonds when viewed along certain carbon-carbon bond axes. Moreover, the boat conformation suffers from the “flagpole” interaction, where two hydrogen atoms on carbon atoms are in close proximity, leading to van der Waals repulsion. Consequently, the boat conformation has considerably higher energy than the chair conformation.

boat conformational isomer

Twist-Boat Ring Conformation

To alleviate some of its torsional strain and minimize flagpole interactions, the boat conformation can transition into the twist conformation. While the twist conformation boasts lower energy compared to the pure boat conformation, it remains less stable than the chair conformation. The gain in stability through this flexing is insufficient to surpass the chair conformation’s stability, with an estimated energy difference of approximately 23 kJmol-1 favoring the chair.

twisted boat conformational isomer